News Did a whistleblower cause the reversal of an Ontario car insurance decision?

21:06  11 july  2018
21:06  11 july  2018 Source:   driving.ca

Small things that can trip up your car insurance rates

  Small things that can trip up your car insurance rates Forgetting renewals or payments not only rises rates but can stay on your record for yearsVideo: Chevy and Shell Let Owners Pay for Gas From Their Cars (provided by The Drive) Your browser does not support this video require(["binding"], function (binding) { binding("wcVideoPlayer", "#video_player_9d134680-89fe-40bf-b1b3-3ceff65cd960").

Even though the weather may be the cause of an accident, a driver is still held responsible when it comes to a single car insurance claim. What to Do if a Friend Crashes Your Car . How to Insure a Car With a Dent or Scratch or Other Minor Damage. Is Your Car Covered In a Natural Disaster?

Get a cheap Ontario car insurance quote from one of our friendly insurance brokers and you could save big. They'll quickly compare the cheapest auto insurance quotes so you'll get the lowest rate.

an office with a desk and chair in a room© Provided by Driving.ca

If you’ve ever had a disagreement regarding an automobile insurance payout, maybe you should pay attention to this article. If you’re one of the applicants to the Ontario Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) – nearly 6,000 in its first year alone –  seeking damages from an insurance company following an auto collision, then maybe your lawyer should be paying attention. And, if you’re one of those rare few who have actually filed what is called a catastrophic injury claim against a auto insurer, well then can I suggest that you and your lawyer start taking notes. Indeed, if you’re one of the former, your whole life could be turned around by a recent ruling by an Ontario Divisional Court in Toronto.

Your Corner Wrench: With LED lamps, it may be time to rethink your insurance coverage

  Your Corner Wrench: With LED lamps, it may be time to rethink your insurance coverage Because of vulnerable positions and a high cost of replacement, it might be good to have a lower deductibleVideo: Why your big kid may still need a booster seat (provided by Consumer Reports) Your browser does not support this video require(["binding"], function (binding) { binding("wcVideoPlayer", "#video_player_a6ea34b4-fc9b-4d46-96dc-91c3cebd5c08").

In Ontario , it is not mandatory to report to the police if the collision causes damages costing less than 00. Many people are aware that car insurance in Ontario is partially a no-fault system. How Long Does an Car Insurance Claim Stay on Your

By CarInsurance .com. Accidents are the reason you bought car insurance . For example, some car insurance companies won’t impose a surcharge if the accident didn’t cause damage or injury in excess of ,000, unless you have had two or more of this type of accident within the last three years.

A little background: In Ontario, as of April 1, 2016, the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) effectively became the last stop for those seeking auto claim damages damages. It replaced the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) in an effort to expedite the tribunal process, though, in a decision handed down by a provincial Divisional Court on June 20, 2018 — Mary Shuttleworth v. Licence Appeal Tribunal, 2018 ONSC 3790 — it appears the LAT might be operating more like a steamroller than a streamliner. The provincial Court set aside the LAT decision, finding that the tribunal failed to follow the proper rules to ensure the independence of the tribunal adjudicator.

On September 28, 2012 Mary Shuttleworth was the passenger in a car hit head on by another, causing her severe physical and psychological injuries. Prior to 1990 in Ontario, crash victims like Shuttleworth would have been left to a traditional tort system — i.e. a lawsuit claiming damages over and above the amount awarded — in the courts to seek redress. Put simply, she would have had to sue. Changes to the Insurance Act in 1990, however, instituted a no fault process, with each party involved receiving claims payouts from their own insurance company regardless of who caused the damages.

CAA Brings Pay-Per-Km Insurance to Canada

  CAA Brings Pay-Per-Km Insurance to Canada Pay-as-you-drive insurance is coming to Canada. Pay-as-you-drive insurance is coming to Canada. CAA Insurance is launching a new way for drivers who don't cover much mileage to benefit on their premiums.

cause or permit the motor vehicle to be operated, on a highway unless the motor vehicle is insured under a contract of automobile insurance . What Drivers Need To Know About Showing Proof Of Car Insurance In Ontario Car Accident Reporting And What Do After You've Been In An Accident A

The Insurance Company Decides . When we buy car insurance , we help protect ourselves from the financial risks of suffering an Claims filed under your uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage usually results in a surcharge that applies to your premium, even though you did not cause the loss.

Why does this matter? Those changes to the insurance act made it easier and faster to get claims paid out. But they also put stringent time and money limits on what those amounts could be. For someone like Mary Shuttleworth, the ensuing battle to prove her injuries would become yet another nightmare. She did receive statutory accident benefits (SAB) from her insurer, Peel Mutual Insurance Company, as per the standards chart. But Shuttleworth’s injuries were deemed catastrophic by an assessor and Peel Mutual, for its part, disagreed. At an impasse, the two parties took their case to the provincial governing body – the aforementioned LAT.

On paper, sorting catastrophic injury is like some callous Scrabble game. You get so many points for each injury, until you hopefully (tragically?) reach 55 per cent. Results are rounded to the nearest 0 or 5, so 38 would become 40, etc. The dueling scores for Shuttleworth’s Whole Person Impairment (WPI) varied 40 per cent as per her insurance company to said minimum 55 per cent from an independent (rounded up from 54). With access to two million dollars hanging on that difference, the LAT’s adjudicator on the case, Susan Sapin, took on increasing importance.

The Driver’s Guide to the 2018 Ontario Election

  The Driver’s Guide to the 2018 Ontario Election On June 7, 2018, Ontarians will head to the polls to elect the next provincial government. We’re no political pundits, so we’re not going to attempt to suss out who has the best chance of winning or predict which party’s policies would be best for Ontarians.Instead, let’s discuss how a victory by each of those four parties would affect the people who own the more than eight million vehicles registered in the province of Ontario, and the workers in the industry that builds them.Auto insurance© Provided by autoTRADER.

By Insure .com - Last updated: June 29, 2016. Dealing with your car insurance company after a crash can be a time-consuming hassle. This way, you'll have evidence gathered at the scene to bolster your position on the cause of the accident.

How Much Car Insurance Do I Need? Will my insurance go up if I move? Answer: The smart decision would be for both drivers to fix their own paint scrapes and not involve insurance at all.

This case was important on several levels, and not just Shuttleworth’s. Ontario’s auto insurance industry has been a political hot potato for decades, and the newly ousted Liberals were jammed into a corner by the NDP to bring down rates. Critics – and I’ve been one – say slashing the product (benefits) to appear to be finding savings leaves victims worse off than before. We were told they’d be going after fraud, but, instead, it appeared they were finding savings by reducing payouts to those truly injured. A year after the LAT’s inception, complaints arose in the legal community that using measures like very rarely awarding legal costs and extremely rigid guidelines accompanied by a fee to apply were compromising victims’ access to fair hearings.

Mary Shuttleworth’s case would be the first catastrophic injury decision to come before the LAT. All eyes were on this decision. The LAT adjudicator found Shuttleworth’s WPI to be 51; two small points – a 53 would have been rounded up to the critical 55 — would have made the difference. Shuttleworth did not appeal.

What to Do if Construction Ruins Your Car

  What to Do if Construction Ruins Your Car <p>It turns out this sort of thing (thankfully) doesn’t happen very often, but there is some precedent for it.</p>Our outing took us past a condo tower under construction (a familiar sight in cities across the country) where that wind threatened to tear off tarps protecting sections of the structure’s open sides.

When a car accident involves two vehicles, one of the drivers will most likely be cited by the police as being the cause due to some kind of negligence. Being that California is a “fault” car insurance state, the person at fault can be sued for medical expenses and other applicable costs.

What should you do if you're in a car accident? When it happens, injuries may be severe and emotions high. Get the names, numbers, addresses, drivers' license numbers, license plate numbers, and basic insurance information from all drivers involved.

And that might have been then end of it, until Shuttleworth’s lawyer, Gary Mazin, received an anonymous note: “I have heard from reliable source that the Sapin’s initial decision was that this was a catastrophic impairment. This decision then went up for review and the Linda Lamoureux changed the decision to make the applicant not catastrophically impaired. Thought you should know that the decision was not made by an independent decision maker who heard the evidence. I was also told that Sapin hesitated to sign this order.”

Now, while the provincial court’s final decision ruled that this note was double hearsay, it was admitted into evidence to explain why it was enough for attorney Mazin to make an access to information request to ascertain what, if any, communications took place between Sapin and Lamoureux that might be prejudicial to Sapin’s decision. He found two emails that led him to believe the adjudicator had been pressured into changing her decision.

This one, dated April 11, 2017, was from the LAT adjudicator Sapin to SLASTO executive chair Lamoureux:

“I just wanted to thank you for your helpful review of this decision and to let you know that I have met with and am working on revising it (for the umpteenth time, this was not a first draft!) to re-organize it a bit, tighten it up and clarify some points in keeping with your suggestions.  And try to make it shorter…

Reckless use of the word ‘autonomous’ causes confusion – and even death

  Reckless use of the word ‘autonomous’ causes confusion – and even death Recent JD Power study highlights the misconceptions between autonomous features and a fully fledged autonomous carA car that sports autonomous features is not an autonomous car. The concepts cannot be used interchangeably, and to do so will cloud consumer knowledge and produce dangerous consequences – to the point that a few people have died in the past couple of months trusting Tesla’s Autopilot feature a little too much. Who’s to blame? Carmakers, advertising agencies, journalists and media. Everybody.

Drivers of older cars are being advised to think carefully before they are tempted to claim on their car insurance following a minor bump. I did not realise at the time that I did not need to claim for my damage."

The insurance company will explain its decision in the car insurance claim denial letter, and you should read through Car insurance policy does not cover the accident: Car insurance You were at fault for the accident: If the insurance adjuster determines that you caused the accident, your

I also wanted to point out that this will take more time, and although I will do my best to meet recent deadlines for this and my three other decisions, I just wanted to advise in advance that the deadlines may be affected somewhat.

I look forward to discussing this decision with you.”

Lamoureux responded: “Susan, thank you for your note.  This is a complex case.  I had the benefit of reading it after a great deal of work on your part and after legal review.  I recall stopping by your desk on a few occasions where you indicated you were struggling with a CAT case – no wonder given the issues at play.  I do appreciate your understanding and willingness to work with legal and myself to ensure the best possible decision.”

The pulse point of the Shuttleworth case isn’t that the adjudicator asked for and received guidance, as per the decision of the court, but that “the consultation must be limited to questions of policy and law. Members of the organization who have not heard the evidence cannot be allowed to re-assess it.”

More importantly, the takeaway here isn’t that adjudicators don’t ask for and receive input from other places, but that “the consultation proceeding cannot be imposed by a superior level of authority within the administrative hierarchy, but can be requested only by the adjudicators themselves.”

One other nugget buried in the decision bears highlighting: “When comments come back to adjudicators from the executive chair, they are being made by a person with authority over the adjudicator’s reappointment.” It may be worth remembering here that, Linda Lamoureux is not just in charge of the Licencing Appeal Tribunal, but is the executive chair of The Safety, Licencing Appeals and Standards Tribunals Ontario (SLASTO) which, besides the LAT, overseas the Animal Care Review Board, Fire Safety Commission, Ontario Civilian Police Commission and the Ontario Parole Board.

Insurance for EVs and Hybrids: How Does It Compare with Regular Cars?

  Insurance for EVs and Hybrids: How Does It Compare with Regular Cars? If you’re considering an electric car or a hybrid, you may be wondering if it costs more or less to insure compared to a regular vehicle; and whether there are any insurance benefits or disadvantages to going green. We were curious too, so we asked some of Canada’s major private and public insurance agencies how they determine insurance rates for EVs and hybrids.&nbsp;We were somewhat surprised to learn that most vehicle insurance agencies in Canada, both private and public, begin with the same vehicle-loss cost evaluation system. It’s called the Canadian Loss Experience Automobile Rating (CLEAR) system from the Insurance Bureau of Canada.

Auto insurance is much less expensive for a 20-year-old full-time student in Winnipeg driving the same car as his counterparts in Toronto, Montreal and Calgary. Statistics show that young drivers do cause a disproportionate amount of damage.

Initiating a proceeding under, or for the enforcement of, any of these statutes, or causing such a If the Secretary of Labor has not issued a final decision within 180 days of the filing of a SOX Although there is no specific Whistleblower Poster, the Whistleblower Protection provisions have the

The result is the court ruling set aside the decision and awarded a new hearing (plus $12,000 in costs) not because it was proven that the adjudicator’s decision had been compromised, but because “the decision in this case was subjected to a peer review process that did not contain the required safeguards of adjudicative independence.”

The LAT – the provincial governing body that all Ontarians must trust in the worst of times – needed a win on its first big catastrophic injury decision. Instead it appears they reached too far trying to secure it. The decision will no doubt trigger others doing what Mazin did for his client: seeking freedom of information requests to see how transparently decisions were arrived at.

Indeed, the best conclusion to this case might come in Lamoureux’s own words, “This is an important decision, one that will be referenced.  I suspect it will receive a great deal of attention.” In the end, justice must not just be done; it must also be seen to be done.

At time of publication, attempts to reach Ms. Sapin have not been successful.

The following statement was received from SLASTO: “It is LAT’s position that members’ participation in the peer and legal review process is a resource for adjudicators. It provides a key element of adjudicator training and development, and ensures consistent quality decision-making. Further, this process assists in avoiding unnecessary reconsiderations, reviews, judicial reviews and appeals, thus minimizing complexity and costs to the parties.

Out of respect for the Court’s decision, we will document the process and remind our adjudicators that they are free to accept or reject comments generated through the review process as they are non-binding and for consideration only.”

Insurance Myths: Real or Busted? .
Car insurance. It’s something you don’t really want to pay for until, all of a sudden, you need it.&nbsp;Car insurance. It’s something you don’t really want to pay for until, all of a sudden, you need it. Then you’re either glad you had it or wishing you had more. That’s the rub with it, too. Car insurance can be complicated: Long documents, myriad terms and conditions, and arcane rate calculation formulas make it all a little mysterious when you’re looking at the bill.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!