Canada Supreme Court case could have far-reaching implications for international child custody cases

15:51  09 november  2017
15:51  09 november  2017 Source:   Toronto Star

Russian spy son to Supreme Court: Don’t waste your time

  Russian spy son to Supreme Court: Don’t waste your time Alex Vavilov says Ottawa’s fight to deny him citizenship is pointless because the astounding circumstances of his case are unlikely to reoccurIn newly filed written arguments, Alexander Vavilov disputes the federal government’s contention that his case undermines the integrity of Canadian citizenship, and says the country’s top court should not waste its time re-examining the June ruling from the Federal Court of Appeal that restored his status.

A case being heard at the Supreme Court on Thursday could change the way Canadian authorities decide the fate of children caught up in international child custody and abduction cases .

Instructions for florida supreme court approved family law form 12.902(d), uniform child custody jurisdiction and enforcement act This form should be used in any case involving custody of, visitation with, or time‐sharing with any minor child (ren).

Kate Baggott says © Provided by Toronto Star Kate Baggott says "ultimately nothing was gained" by her four-year legal battle. She described the experience as “surreal."

It took four years battling her estranged husband in German and Canadian courts before Kate Baggott was finally allowed to settle with her two children in Canada.

On Thursday, the St. Catharines woman hopes to begin the final chapter of her struggle when the Supreme Court of Canada examines the workings of an agreement that determines the fate of children caught up in international child custody and abduction cases.

Ultimately, the court’s ruling could change the way Canadian authorities decide what country these children should live in and result in a more child-centric approach.

State to appeal for longer Pistorius sentence

  State to appeal for longer Pistorius sentence South African prosecutors on Friday will argue for Oscar Pistorius to be given a longer jail sentence, saying the six years he is serving for killing his girlfriend is "shockingly low".The National Prosecution Authority will present its case to a one-day hearing at the Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein. Judges are expected to hand down their ruling at a later date.

Cases of child custody fall under muamlat1 in compendiums of Islamic Fiqh. When the child reaches the age whereby he can tell right from wrong, his wish is taken into consideration by the courts which is subject to the welfare of the child .

Supreme Court ruling could have far - reaching implications for brokerages. California Supreme Court ruled buyer and seller agents working for same firm owe fiduciary responsibility to each other’s clients.

In Baggott’s case, the years of legal wrangling meant that her children lived in limbo, moving back and forth between Germany and Canada, disrupting their education and making it impossible to put down roots.

“Ultimately nothing was gained from having gone through this process,” Baggott told the Star in an interview.

She described the experience as “surreal” and said the court process was too focused on legal arguments instead of what is best for the children.

The Supreme Court’s ruling will have no effect on Baggott’s case, after a German court finally awarded her full custody of her son, 15, and daughter, 11, from their father John Paul Balev and let the three return to Canada in April. But the court decided to proceed anyway with the appeal of Ontario Court of Appeal ruling as it recognized the importance of the issue.

Mother in high-profile B.C. sex-abuse case appeals to Supreme Court

  Mother in high-profile B.C. sex-abuse case appeals to Supreme Court Mother in high-profile B.C. sex-abuse case appeals to Supreme CourtThe Metro Vancouver mom at the heart of an eight-year-old, high-conflict child tug-of-war that rocked the provincial government has asked the Supreme Court of Canada to consider her case.

• Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) Affidavit, Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Form 12.902(d). If you do not fully understand any of the terms below or their implications , you should speak with an attorney before going any further .

blog 'crystalwilson.blogdetik.com' is not exists. International Environmental Policy & Theory) eBook.

All the parties at Thursday’s hearing hope the high court can provide guidance on the definition of “habitual residence” under the Hague Convention, an international child protection agreement recognized by 98 countries.

The designation determines where a child in a custodial dispute should temporarily stay while the case is ongoing and which country has the authority to adjudicate the case.

“This comes down to how we figure out where a child’s habitual residence is. Right now, there is no national consistency on this,” said Patric Senson, a co-counsel for the Baggott, one of eight parties with standing before the Supreme Court.

“Whatever comes out, it will provide some clarity for everybody involved in this situation so everyone will be working from the same page . . . reduce the amount of litigation and stress for the child and litigants.”

In Canada and elsewhere, different courts have different interpretations of habitual residence, with some defining it as the last place of the residence agreed upon by the parents prior to the removal of the child by one party, while others base it on the children’s best interests.

Supreme Court approves B.C. ski resort development on Indigenous lands

  Supreme Court approves B.C. ski resort development on Indigenous lands Supreme Court approves B.C. ski resort development on Indigenous landsIn a landmark decision on how courts should protect not only Indigenous religious beliefs, but all religious beliefs, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled Thursday that a British Columbia First Nation, the Ktunaxa people, could not block the development of a ski resort in the Jumbo Valley.

blog 'sharongrabow.blogdetik.com' is not exists. Legislative Simulation/Congressional Election Simulation/ Supreme Court

Kagan said that went too far , and was at odds with previous U.S. Supreme Court decisions that prescribed “a more flexible 1st Class Jeffrey Lee Chafin’s lawsuit moot, because international child custody suits must be conducted in the child ’s “country of habitual residence.”

The appeal to the Supreme Court was brought by the Office of the Children’s Lawyer (OCL), a Ontario body that represents children under age 18 in court cases involving custody, access and child protection, as well as in civil, and estates and trusts cases.

Baggott, a writer, and Balev, a computer programmer, married in Toronto in 2000 and moved to Germany on work permits the following year for his job. Their two children were both born there but were not eligible for German citizenship.

The couple’s relationship fell apart but the family still lived together in the same house when the mother and their two children moved back to Canada in 2013 after the father agreed to let the children stay with their mother in Canada for 16 months.

However, according to Baggott’s submission to the high court, Balev later went to German authorities claiming Baggott abducted their children, sparking the four-year legal battle.

Last September, the Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed the children’s objections to returning to Germany and ruled that the mother breached the Hague Convention and they must all go back because Germany was their “habitual residence.”

Pistorius case returns as prosecutors seek longer sentence

  Pistorius case returns as prosecutors seek longer sentence Pistorius case returns as prosecutors seek longer sentenceProsecutors are asking South Africa's Supreme Court of Appeal to give them permission to challenge Pistorius' six-year sentence, calling it "shockingly" lenient.

ADR Options in Child Support & Custody Cases / The Final Details of D.

Further , the dissolution of a marriage could have profound and long-term financial ramifications, and, if children are involved, long-term custody , visitation, and support implications for both parties.

In its factums to the Supreme Court, the OCL said the appeal court decision to return Baggott’s two children to Germany was wrong because it failed to consider the best interests of the minors, who at that point had lived in Canada for three years, were in school and had friends and support in the community.

“The goal of deterring ‘abduction’ and protecting the interests of children generally was prioritized over the rights of the individual children before the courts,” said the OCL in its submission.

“As a result, (the children) were harmed by the operation of the very Convention that was meant to protect them. In this appeal, the OCL urges an interpretation of the Convention that is child-centric, consistent with Canada’s obligations.”

However, the attorneys general in Ottawa, Ontario and British Columbia argue the current approach in determining the child’s residence offers an “objective” guide for Canadian authorities to follow.

“The Convention is intended to combat international child abductions, including the wrongful retention of children in foreign states and to protect children from their harmful effects,” said the submission from the federal attorney general.

The submission said “the prompt return of the child to the state of habitual residence best protects the interests of children by respecting rights of custody under domestic laws. The Convention is not intended to determine the custody arrangement that is in the best interests of the child.”

Ontario warns in its submission that the child-centric approach proposed by the appellant “would incentivize parents to subject their children to ‘harmful manipulation’ — developing artificial attachments to their new environment — in order to influence the child’s perspective about their habitual residence.”

While the case is still up in air, both Baggott and Balev said in their submissions the fight has exhausted their financial resources.

“The Hague Convention is meant for genuine cases of abduction when one parent disappears with the child in the night,” said Baggott, who is still struggling to turn a new page of her life with her two children. “It is not meant for cases like ours.”

Jamaica's Carter at court for Bolt Olympic relay medal case .
Jamaica's Carter at court for Bolt Olympic relay medal case Jamaican sprinter Nesta Carter is at the Court of Arbitration for Sport to appeal against disqualification from the 2008 Olympics in a doping case that cost Usain Bolt a 4x100-meter relay gold medal.Usain Bolt loses 2008 Olympic relay gold after Nesta Carter's positive test Carter shielded his face from media on arriving at sport's highest court on Wednesday for a closed-doors hearing expected to last all day. A verdict is expected within weeks.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!