Canada Parents convicted in son's meningitis death relying on judge's 'failed' jury charge in Supreme Court appeal

12:56  15 may  2018
12:56  15 may  2018 Source:   cbc.ca

Marissa Shephard's trial heads in to final phase

  Marissa Shephard's trial heads in to final phase Marissa Shephard's trial heads in to final phaseOn Friday, the crown and the defence both presented their closing arguments to the jury.

The couple who were convicted in 2016 in their toddlers son ’ s meningitis death in southern Alberta will appeal to Canada’ s highest court on Tuesday to either overturn their convictions or order a new trial.

Parents convicted in son ' s meningitis death relying on judge ' s ' failed ' jury charge in Supreme Court appeal . Father convicted in son ' s meningitis death will not speak at wellness expos after backlash.

a person posing for the camera: David and Collet Stephan were found guilty in a court in Lethbridge, Alta., in 2016 of failing to provide the necessaries of life to 19-month-old Ezekiel. They are now appealing that conviction to the Supreme Court of Canada.© Facebook David and Collet Stephan were found guilty in a court in Lethbridge, Alta., in 2016 of failing to provide the necessaries of life to 19-month-old Ezekiel. They are now appealing that conviction to the Supreme Court of Canada.

The couple who were convicted in 2016 in their toddler son's meningitis death in southern Alberta will appeal to Canada's highest court Tuesday to either overturn their convictions or order a new trial.

Court documents obtained by CBC News outline the arguments Collet and David Stephan plan to rely on during their appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Their main argument is that the trial judge failed to deliver an appropriate jury charge.

Woman enters not guilty plea at Lethbridge manslaughter trial

  Woman enters not guilty plea at Lethbridge manslaughter trial Woman enters not guilty plea at Lethbridge manslaughter trialOut of a pool of more than 80 people, seven men and five women were chosen at random to serve as jurors in the manslaughter trial for Jillian Across the Mountain.

Parents convicted in son ' s meningitis death relying on judge ' s ' failed ' jury charge in Supreme Court appeal . Father convicted in son ' s meningitis death will not speak at wellness expos after backlash.

Alberta parents convicted in son ' s meningitis death call for courthouse rally in anti-vax interview. The appeal court judges ultimately found the trial judge "exercised his discretion as gatekeeper" and said the expert evidence was not repetitive.

The Stephan family was residing in Lethbridge when their 18-month-old son Ezekiel died in 2012.

The couple, who now live in Nelson, B.C., were convicted of failing to provide the necessaries of life following a trial in 2016.

Last November, the Alberta Appeal Court upheld the convictions. But because one of the three judges disagreed and found the couple should have been granted a new trial, the Stephans had automatic leave to have the Supreme Court of Canada hear arguments.

Original trial

During their 2016 trial, jurors heard the Stephans treated their son with natural remedies and homemade smoothies containing hot pepper, ginger root, horseradish and onion.

The Stephans refused to take the boy to a doctor even when he became so stiff he couldn't sit in his car seat.

New trial for parents of boy dead from meningitis

  New trial for parents of boy dead from meningitis David Stephan and his wife, Collet, were found guilty in 2016 of failing to provide the necessaries of life to 19-month-old Ezekiel in 2012. David Stephan and his wife, Collet, were found guilty in 2016 of failing to provide the necessaries of life to 19-month-old Ezekiel in 2012.

CALGARY — Lawyers say just because parents convicted in the meningitis death of their toddler are taking their case to the Supreme Court that doesn’t mean they will get the privilege of a long deliberation.

Lawyers say just because parents convicted in the meningitis death of their toddler are taking their case to the Supreme Court that doesn't mean they will get the privilege of a long deliberation.

Only when Ezekiel stopped breathing did the parents call 911. After days of being ill, he was eventually rushed to a local hospital but died after being transferred to Calgary.

Defence seeking new trial

In the documents obtained by CBC, the Stephans' legal team relies largely on the opinion of the Alberta Appeal Court judge who disagreed with their convictions and thought the couple should have been granted a new trial.

According to their factums, the Stephans' defence believes that the instructions given to the jury by the judge were inadequate.

"The jury instructions in this case provided virtually no assistance with respect to the analytical exercise the jury needed to perform," reads one of two factums prepared by the defence. "It did not identify the discrete issues the jury had to consider and it failed to highlight the evidence that was legally relevant to those issues."

Calgary man jailed for sex assault of N.S. classmate

  Calgary man jailed for sex assault of N.S. classmate HALIFAX - An 21-year-old Alberta man convicted of sexually assaulting a classmate at Dalhousie University in Halifax has been sentenced to 29 months in a federal prison. A Nova Scotia Supreme Court jury found Chris Davidson guilty of sexual assault and unlawful confinement in February. Court heard that the two met in September 2015, but their relationship dissolved 72 hours later when Davidson sexually assaulted the young woman — then 17 — after a night of heavy drinking.The Calgary man told police he had no memory of what happened that night, saying he had consumed six or seven vodka shots and blacked out. © Provided by thecanadianpress.

Lawyers say just because parents convicted in the meningitis death of their toddler are taking their case to the Supreme Court , that doesn’t mean they will get the privilege of a long deliberation. Lisa Silver, law professor at the University of Calgary

Lawyers say just because parents convicted in the meningitis death of their toddler are taking their case to the Supreme Court that doesn't mean they will get the privilege of a long deliberation. Lisa Silver, law professor at the University of Calgary

Deficiencies in the jury charge, according to the defence team, included the judge not reviewing what the defence believes to be substantial aspects of evidence and linking them back to live legal issues, failing to caution the jury on the permissible and impermissible uses of expert evidence, not delivering the charge in plain language and that the charge relied on "boilerplate model instructions" without adapting them to the circumstances of the specific case.

"The appellant submits that for all of the foregoing reasons … the jury instruction contained reversible error and a new trial is required," reads the document.

'Attentive, loving parents'

The Stephans' defence team says the facts of this case are very different from most others where failure to provide the necessaries of life is charged.

"The appellants were attentive, loving parents who were actively attempting to fulfil their parental duties," reads their factum. "If their 'failure' was not taking Ezekiel to a doctor, it did not stem from eccentric beliefs or a distrust of 'modern' medicine as the Crown tried to allege."

Calgary bus driver saves family from burning house

  Calgary bus driver saves family from burning house A Calgary bus driver is being hailed as a "godsend" for saving a sleeping family from a northeast house fire early Tuesday morning. "We were all sleeping and I guess the bus driver who does this route, he was just finishing up his last run and he drove around the community on the run and he thought he smelled smoke," said Marsha Bastarache, who lives in the home in the Redstone neighbourhood with her son and his family. "So then he came back around again and he noticed the fire out front," said Bastarche of the fire, which broke out around 1 a.m.

A couple who had been convicted in the meningitis death of their son say they have been vindicated by the Supreme Court of Canada' s decision to order a new trial. David Stephan and his wife, Collet, were found guilty in 2016 of failing to provide the necessaries of life to 19-month-old Ezekiel.

Alberta father posts Facebook response after conviction in son ’ s meningitis death is upheld. Judge upholds convictions of Alberta parents who tried to treat toddler’ s meningitis with natural remedies. The Supreme Court heard arguments from the couple’ s lawyer and the Crown on Tuesday

Ezekiel Stephan died in 2012 from untreated meningitis.© Courtesy of the Stephan family Ezekiel Stephan died in 2012 from untreated meningitis.

The defence claims that the evidence instead established ongoing consultations with a medically-trained emergency room nurse as well as an urgent 911 call and subsequent trip to the hospital.

"The appellants were not trying to hide an injured child because they feared legal repercussions," reads the factum. "They did not take Ezekiel to the doctor because his symptoms appeared to be mild and consistent with a typical cold or flu. They were told by a medical professional that she could find nothing wrong with him."

According to the defence, the determination that the Stephans' conduct represented a marked departure from the standard of a reasonable parent was "compromised by a misleading, confusing instruction."

"An error which was compounded [by] inadmissible and highly prejudicial opinion offered by a number of medical doctors regarding what they would have done."

Confusing for jurors

The Stephans' legal team will argue that the trial judge's legal analysis, contained within a "single, 92-word sentence," was confusing for jurors.

"The trial judge had an obligation to provide the test in plain, intelligible language, that it would be accessible and comprehensible by the jury," reads the factum, adding that this was an issue noted by the dissenting judge in the provincial appeal process.

'Brave' Calgary boy saved others from U.S. child predator, police say

  'Brave' Calgary boy saved others from U.S. child predator, police say 'Brave' Calgary boy saved others from U.S. child predator, police say Joseph Daniel Saucedo, 26, of Vista, Calif., was sentenced in federal court in San Diego County Friday to 20 years in prison and 20 years of supervised release for attempting to manipulate two children into sending him sexually explicit photos, and threatening to expose them if they didn't comply, according to a release from U.S. law enforcement.

Parents ' convictions in son ' s meningitis death upheld by Alberta Appeal Court . Because one of the three judges on the appeal panel dissented, the couple has an automatic right to have the Supreme Court of Canada hear arguments in the case.

OTTAWA — A couple who had been convicted in the meningitis death of their son say they have been vindicated by the Supreme Court of Canada’ s decision to order a new trial. David Stephan and his wife, Collet

The defence will suggest that the jurors in this case would have had to weigh the evidence and answer no less than 22 discrete questions, including what level of risk was objectively foreseeable to a reasonable person in David/Collet's position when the failure occurred.

No lay person would have been able to identify the discrete questions necessary to evaluate each element of the offence. -  Stephans' defence team

"No lay person would have been able to identify the discrete questions necessary to evaluate each element of the offence (much less isolate the evidence properly applicable to each question)," writes the defence.

Further, the defence suggests that the judge's instructions "failed" to adequately review the evidence, simplify it, or link it to relevant issues in the case.

"As noted in the dissent, the trial judge failed to canvass the 'circumstances' that presented to each of the appellants, failed to explain the permissible uses of the medical evidence, failed to draw the jury's attention to key defence evidence and failed to make it clear to the jury how they should assess whether or not there has been a marked departure."

Further, the Stephans argue that the judge took more time reviewing the Crown's evidence than that of the defence — something the first appeal found was because the Crown had simply called more evidence than the defence had.

a person smiling for the camera: David Stephan and his wife, Collet Stephan, arrive at a Lethbridge court in 2016.© David Rossiter/Canadian Press David Stephan and his wife, Collet Stephan, arrive at a Lethbridge court in 2016.

Alberta Crown disagrees

The factum prepared for the Supreme Court appeal by Alberta's attorney general (Crown) disagrees with the basis of the Stephans' appeal and says that no reviewable errors have been established.

Bernardo to stand trial on weapon possession charge

  Bernardo to stand trial on weapon possession charge Convicted killer Paul Bernardo will stand trial in October on a weapon possession charge laid in connection with an offence allegedly committed in a maximum-security prison. Bernardo is facing one count of possession of a weapon, alleged to be a shank comprised of a screw and pen.He appeared briefly via video link in a Napanee, Ont., court today, where his trial was set for Oct. 5.Court documents show the alleged offence occurred Feb. 9 at a prison in Bath, Ont.Bernardo, one of Canada's most infamous killers, was arrested in the 1990s on allegations that he raped and murdered multiple teenage girls at his Ontario home.

Defence tells Appeal Court that jury was overwhelmed in toddler meningitis case. Alberta parents convicted in son ' s meningitis death get bail.

"The dissenting judgment misapprehends the nature of the offence and fails to apply the appropriate standard for appellate review," reads the Crown's factum.

The Crown said the majority of the Court of Appeal is correct in that the specifics sought by the dissenting judgment are not required in this case.

"The dissent's suggestion that the trial judge should determine specific necessaries should have been provided and when, as a part of the jury instructions on whether there was a failure, invites a reviewable error and infringes on the jury's fact finding duties."

No assumptions were made about any elements of the offence. The charge cautioned the jury on the use of the expert evidence, sufficiently linked the evidence to the issues and was understandable. - The Crown's factum

According to the Crown, the Stephans' argument that the charge could have been worded or structured differently does not amount to a reviewable error.

"No assumptions were made about any elements of the offence," reads the Crown's factum. "The charge cautioned the jury on the use of the expert evidence, sufficiently linked the evidence to the issues and was understandable."

The Crown says that the majority of the Alberta Appeal Court, after reading the jury's charge as a whole, concluded, "the jury was properly instructed on the mens rea (guilty mind) element and the marked departure of a reasonable and prudent parent."

The Crown's argument insists that not only was the jury properly instructed, but the structure of a jury charge does not amount to a reviewable error and that the charge sufficiently related to the evidence.

"The essence of the appellants' argument is that the charge is deficient as the trial judge should have emphasized the defence evidence while minimizing the Crown evidence," said the Crown. "This is dangerously close to telling the jury how to to weigh and consider evidence. In this case, the evidentiary review was balanced and sufficient."

Crown continues to seek increased sentences

Prosecutors are still asking the Alberta Court of Appeal to increase the couple's sentences. David was given four months in jail while Collet was given three months of house arrest.

CBC News has not been able to confirm if a date has been set for those arguments.

  • Couple attempting to overturn convictions in son's meningitis death heading to Supreme Court in May

  • Parents' convictions in son's meningitis death upheld by Alberta Appeal Court

  • 'No room for justice': David Stephan posts tirade after conviction upheld in son's meningitis death
  • MORE CRIME NEWS | Trial cancelled for southern Alberta woman accused of killing mother
  • MORE CRIME NEWS | Canada spent $550K to track down Calgary murder suspect who fled to Vietnam
  • Georgia jury awards $1 billion after guard rapes teen .
    Georgia jury awards $1 billion after guard rapes teenHope Cheston was outside by some picnic tables with her boyfriend during a party in October 2012 when an armed security guard approached, attorney L. Chris Stewart told The Associated Press on Wednesday. The guard told the boyfriend not to move and raped Cheston, Stewart said.

    —   Share news in the SOC. Networks
    This is interesting!