Money What’s More Important: Your Saving Rate or the Rate of Return?

21:15  16 april  2017
21:15  16 april  2017 Source:

Polar’s new M430 flagship running watch has wrist-based heart rate sensors

  Polar’s new M430 flagship running watch has wrist-based heart rate sensors An overdue upgrade to the M400The new M430, which is the follow up to Polar’s M400 flagship running watch, has six LED lights for optical heart rate sensing, built-in GPS, and a thinner, lighter build. It looks pretty similar to the previous model — still has a monochrome display, and still has that same unibody design, which means you can’t swap out straps — but weighs just 51 grams (1.8 ounces) compared with 56 grams, or two ounces, for the M400. It also has a redesigned perforated strap, for breathability.

What if you had invested for a 7% rate of return instead? You would only have amassed 2,163. That’ s a ,712 difference, which is many Canadians’ one-year salary. Investor takeaway. Initially, your saving rate is more important . Without savings , you have no money to invest.

What matters more – your personal savings rate or your investing rate of return ? Your instinct is probably to say the latter, as that is what gets far more attention. We are often thinking about how we can make a higher return ; we rarely think about saving more .

think© Provided by Fool think

You’re probably here because you want to build wealth. Assuming you’re starting from scratch, should you focus on saving more or generating a higher rate of return?

Quotes in the article



Housing starts pace hits highest since 2007

  Housing starts pace hits highest since 2007 OTTAWA - The annual pace of housing starts increased more than expected in March and hit their highest level since September 2007. The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. says the seasonally adjusted annual rate of housing starts for March came in at 253,720 units, up from 214,253 in February. Economists had expected a reading of 215,000 for last month, according to Thomson Reuters. The overall increase came as the annual pace of urban starts increased by 20.2 per cent to 235,674 units, boosted by an increase in multi-unit starts.Multi-unit urban starts increased by 30.2 per cent to 160,989, while single-detached urban starts increased by 3.1 per cent to 74,685 units.

What matters more – your personal savings rate or your investing rate of return ? By further extension, their rate of return on said investments is not nearly as important as their savings rate .

The other saves 10% and earns 5% annual returns . And that’ s exactly why it’ s so important —for me as much as anyone—to listen to what Ferri and Richards are saying. And when your savings rate goes up, your expenses (as a percentage of your pay) have to go down, right?

Royal Bank of Canada



I think you should pay attention to your saving rate first:

  • saving rate = net savings ÷ disposable income

Back in the 1980s, Canadians saved as much as 20% of their disposable income! In the last few years, saving rates have sadly dwindled down to 3-6%.

This partly has to do with low interest rates. Why bother put money in a savings account when they earn you close to nothing?

What about the bond yield from the Government of Canada? The one- to three-year bonds average yields of less than 0.80%. Even the long-term bonds of five to 10 years yield only about 1.3%.

Some people end up spending more money than they mean to. The motto seems to be “enjoy life now before things become more expensive.”

Activity trackers not always great for monitoring exercise heart rate

  Activity trackers not always great for monitoring exercise heart rate <p>Some people who rely on fitness trackers to see how hard they work out may want to rethink this approach, according to a small study that suggests the increasingly popular devices may get more accurate heart rate readings when users are at rest than during exercise.</p>The study tested four popular wristbands, each of which has a light-emitting diode (LED) that measures heart rate from tiny changes in skin blood volumes by using light reflected from the skin.

In fact, they are not even the most important piece of the puzzle. Your savings rate is. Here is what they found: Saving 1% of your income every year for 30 years with a 10% return would lead to a total portfolio value of ,096.

In other words, the amount of money you contribute to your retirement fund is far more important than what investment vehicles the money is parked in, as you can control the former But even incremental savings - rate increases play a far bigger role than corresponding increases in the rate of return .

However, low interest rates aren’t an excuse to not save.

budget savings© Provided by Fool budget savings

If you’re willing to be more adventurous, you can generate higher returns by exposing yourself to higher risk through stocks.

Now, higher risk doesn’t mean you’ll lose your hard-earned savings. It just means you need to pick stocks carefully and buy at the right price.

At the end of the day though, it comes down to the fact that you need to have some savings to start investing. If you can save, say, $50 per month, then your best option will probably be buying into a broad market index, such as SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEARCA:SPY), over time. By doing so, you should earn a long-term rate of return of about 7%.

Once you’ve saved up a sizeable amount from compounding returns from your broad market index investment, you can decide if you want to convert to individual stock picking to boost your returns.

3 players having a rough start to 2017

  3 players having a rough start to 2017 3 players having a rough start to 2017 It's true, small sample sizes aren't worth drawing any serious conclusions.

Both have a place, but your savings rate is more important now. But even if you achieve a more modest 10% return , saving 00 a month for 50 years would net you ,829,819. That’ s significantly more than most lawyers will ever achieve.

Today we’re going to discuss the most important variable in your control when it comes to setting your Retirement or Financial Independence date: your ideal savings rate . What About Rate of Return ?

It’s not unheard of to earn rates of returns of 8% or higher from stock investing. You may think, “8% is only 1% higher than 7%. Why would someone spend extra time to manage a stock portfolio for a mere 1% additional return?”

Over the long run, 1% of compounded returns can make a big difference. Let’s say you’ve amassed $10,000 and continue to put in $50 per month in your portfolio. If you earn an 8% rate of return, in 30 years, you’ll amass $183,875.

What if you had invested for a 7% rate of return instead? You would only have amassed $142,163. That’s a $41,712 difference, which is many Canadians’ one-year salary.

An 8% rate of return is actually pretty conservative for stock investing. So, you don’t have to risk life and limb to get satisfactory returns for your hard-earned savings.

Here are some conservative stock ideas that can deliver a long-term rate of return of at least 8%: Royal Bank of Canada (TSX:RY)(NYSE:RY), Fortis Inc.(TSX:FTS)(NYSE:FTS), and Telus Corporation(TSX:T)(NYSE:TU).

Investor takeaway

Initially, your saving rate is more important. Without savings, you have no money to invest. As your investment portfolio grows, the returns generated from it will have a bigger effect on your wealth building.

Which MLB teams' bullpens are ripe for change?

  Which MLB teams' bullpens are ripe for change? The closer carousel goes round and round each week. Changes come from injury, ineffectiveness or even an electric arm that emerges from a team’s bullpen. While we can’t predict for certain which bullpens will be overturned, know that some closers will lose their jobs in 2017. The astute fantasy owner needs to be prepared. One week into the regular season, here are the shakiest bullpen situations in the majors, along with candidates to step into the closer’s role should the incumbent run into trouble. American League Oakland: This is one of the most unsettled bullpens in the early going. First, incumbent Ryan Madson set up Santiago Casilla on April 3, and Casilla converted the save. Reliever Ryan Dull blew a save the next night, and Casilla then worked the middle innings in appearances on April 6 and April 8. Sean Doolittle has the best projected skill set, although he throws from the left side and has a significant “when healthy” caveat. Casilla appears to be the early season option, but write it in soft pencil. The A’s won’t be afraid to change it up. Los Angeles: Mike Scioscia said the Angels would use a committee, then sent out Cam Bedrosian to convert the first save. Bedrosian should have this job based on superior skills, but Scioscia is using him for multiple innings and might spread saves around. Huston Street’s return complicates the matter for fantasy owners.

What has a greater impact on your wealth, your savings rate or the returns you earn on your investments? Once it’ s saved , you can invest it in whatever you like, but just starting is the most important step!

1. Your Savings Rate . The amount you save is far and away the most important factor as you start investing. Your savings rate will far outweigh the returns you earn. As Vanguard founder John Bogle once said: “In investing, you get what you don’t pay for.”

So, once you’ve developed a habit for a specific saving rate of, say, 10%, you should look into improving your rate of return. You’ll find that, historically, stocks, tend to outperform other asset classes.

The proven "return accelerator" for dividend stocks!

If you love dividend stocks or are in need of retirement income, we have a brand-new, exclusive report that's a must-read for any serious investor.

Written by celebrated Canadian journalist Jonathan Chevreau, this report outlines one of the 'wonders of the investment world' - how to use it, capitalize on it, and make money as best you can.

Click here now to claim your copy!

Fool contributor Kay Ng owns shares of FORTIS INC.

This is why people are declining your wedding invitations .
People living in the Northeast are more likely to give cash as a gift.Wedding guests in the Northeast are more than twice as likely as the rest of the country to spend at least $200 on a wedding gift for a close friend or family member, according to a survey of 1,000 U.S. adults by personal finance website What’s more, people in the Northeast and Midwest most often give cash, while those in the South and the West are more likely to give an actual gift from the wedding registry.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!